R J Mazinter
Vice Chairman
P.O Box 4176 Cape Town 8000
Tel: 021 – 4389377
Email: mavrod@iafrica.com
Cape Times Editor
Dear Sir
Shannon Ebrahim, who targets Israel and places that country in the cross-hairs of her ire, chastises a democracy, which Israel’s opponents are not. Libya, Syria, and Iraq are brutal dictatorships, far more than even those of Egypt or Jordan. “Parliaments” in Iran, Morocco, and on the West Bank are not freely democratic. In all of them, candidates are either screened, preselected, or coerced. Daily television and newspapers are subject to restrictions and censorship; “elected” leaders are not open to public audit and censure. Death, not voters, brings changes of rule in the Middle Eastern world.
True freedom and democracy demands some prior traditions of cultural tolerance, widespread literacy, and free markets.
Only in secular Israel can one detect free speech and liberality of custom and religion, much more so, than say, in Saudi Arabia, Iran, or Palestine. Coexistance exists in Israel, very rarely so in the Arab world.
We see in Israel spirited debate, homegrown criticism and differing advocacy from Left and Right. Israeli newspapers and television reflect a diversity of views, from rabid Zionism to almost suicidal pacifism. There are Arab-Israeli legislators and plenty of Jewish intellectuals who openly write and broadcast in opposition to the particular government of the day, a freedom not available in Palestine. Could a Palestinian, Egyptian, or Syrian novelist write something favorable about Netenyahu, or hostile to Mr. Assad, or a Palestinian produce a satire about President Mahmoud Abas? Such dissidents might suffer stones and fatwas rather than mere ripostes in the letters to the editor of the local newspapers.
We do not see goose-stepping soldiers in Haifa as we do in Baghdad. Nor are there in Tel-Aviv children with plastic bombs strapped to their sides on parade. Nor do Israeli presidents wear plastic sunglasses, tote pistols or have chests full of cheap and tawdry medals.
Wars in the Middle East are not fought to return the West Bank or Gaza, but to finish off what Hitler could not. Israel, be its GNP, free society, or liberal press, is a wound to the psyche, not a physical threat to the Arab world. Israel did not murder the Kurds or Shiites. It does not butcher Islam’s children in Syria. Yet both the victims and the perpetrators of those crimes against Muslims—or to her shame, Ebrahim—answer “Israel” to every problem.
Palestinians should see in its policy toward Israel their future hope, rather than present despair. Israel is based on true democracy that can evolve, rather than on race, religion, or language that more often cannot. If the Palestinians really wished to become accepted, then regular elections, a free press, an open and honest economy, and religious tolerance alone would do what suicide bombers and a duplicitous terrorist leader cannot.